How The Overage Player Rule Tarnishes The Olympic Tournament

The Beijing Olympics are now a month away including the Under 23's Olympic football tournament to be held at different venues in China. While many people may think otherwise, it is actually a tournament with a lot of history and with a lot of purpose. Firstly, what many people don't know is that the Olympic tournament was the first international football tournament, the World Cup was created afterwards and was largely the result of the success of this Olympic tournament. Secondly, the Olympic tournament provides teams (and fans alike) with a good indication as to how teams are shaping up for the next 2 World Cups.

The establishment of the World Cup led to the Olympic tournament falling in importance and prestige, and this wasn't helped by FIFA deciding to keep the tournament exclusive to amateurs among other restrictions.

Presently, only players below the age of 23 can take part and this was done in order to reflect other FIFA youth tournaments such as the under 20's and under 17's. Notwithstanding, FIFA permits teams to have 3 overage players if they choose to. Many are of the opinion, including he who write this, that this is completely unrequired and does not comply with the objectives of such a tournament.

I know people will have already started writing their responses to what I've just said, but before they press the "Enter" button, give me the opportunity to clarify my point and reasons behind this.

Both the overage player rule and the under 23 rule were implemented at the same time in a move to give all teams the chance to compete on an equal footing. The amateurs only rule meant that the best players in the world did not have any chance of participating. Nevertheless, the overage player rule has generated a lot of controversy, so the benefits of such a rule must be analysed.

If money talks, then the participation of overage players is justified. Such players tend to be well recognised professionals such as Ronaldinho and Lionel Messi and basically guarantee widespread coverage of the tournament, that it wouldn't get otherwise. Apart from the financial side of things, the presence of overage players gives a boost to young players to any team and this could be just what they need to become experienced and confident players. Both players and coaches certainly love the overage player rule.

Notwithstanding, money does talk at FIFA and the decision to include overage players is an indication that the origins and purpose of youth tournaments have been lost. While the tournament may be for players under the age of 23, it is still a youth tournament especially when it is compared to the World Cup Finals.

And the main characteristic of a youth tournament is its exclusivity. A young player growing up, knows that he will only get 1 chance to play in the U/17 tournament and 1 chance of playing in the U/20 tournament (I know there have been cases of players participating of more than one of each, but these are very rare). However, any player can grow up knowing that if they miss out on the Olympics, they may still be able to play in it in the future due to the overage rule. The prestige and exclusivity of the tournament is lost. The reason that was driving these players disappears. This is not what football is about. We all know that football is about taking your chances and the Olympic Games should not be any different.

Article Source: ArticlesMaker.com

About the Author: About the author: Antonio da Silva is one of the chief writers of SportsNewsFootball.com, a leading sports news football website renowned for its fearless and critical analysis of the major issues affecting the beloved game of football. 

Next and Previous Articles

Next Article - Hospitality Boxes.com Launched! Sell Your Hospitality Contracts!
Previous Article - How FIFA Does NOT Respect Both The Olympic & Football Spirit

Article Statistics

ArticlesMaker.com » Recreation-and-sports » How The Overage Player Rule Tarnishes The Olympic Tournament

Author: AntoniodaSilva  |  Total views: 37  |  Word Count: 579